In a recent development during the hearing of a Special Leave Petition(SLP), the Supreme Court mandated that all such petitioners who are applying for bail or anticipatory bail would have to disclose their criminal antecedents as well.
Consult Verified Legal Experts
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Agreements
- Audits
- Trademark & other IP
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Audits
- Trademark & other IP
- Company Registration
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
- Matrimonial Disputes
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Consumer Protection
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Trademark & other IP
Experience
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Property Matter
- Corporate Issues
- Startup Compliances
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
Experience
- Audits
- Trademark & other IP
- Company Registration
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Consumer Protection
- Legal Notice
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Consumer Protection
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Cyber Crime
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Property Matter
- Corporate Issues
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Property Matter
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Property Matter
- Corporate Issues
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Corporate Issues
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Audits
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Matrimonial Disputes
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Case Transfer Matters
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Agreements
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- RERA Matters
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Cyber Crime
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
Experience
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Insurance Matters
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Court Marriage
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Cyber Crime
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Insurance Matters
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Property Matter
Experience
- Property Matter
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Bail Matter
- Consumer Protection
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
- RERA Matters
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Rape & POCSO
- Anticipatory Bail
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Company Registration
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Cyber Crime
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
- Matrimonial Disputes
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Audits
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
In a recent development during the hearing of a Special Leave Petition(SLP), the Supreme Court mandated that all such petitioners who are applying for bail or anticipatory bail would have to disclose their criminal antecedents as well. The Apex Court mentioned that a growing tendency could be observed amongst the individuals applying for bail or anticipatory bail that they do not reveal their involvement with any other criminal record, taking the Court “for a ride”, the Top Court pointed out.
Facts of the Case:-
- In the present case, the Apex Court was hearing a special leave petition which was filed by a man who was accused of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and had been in the custody since May 2018. After he was denied bail from the Allahabad High Court in October last year, he approached the Supreme Court for bail.
- The Apex Court, mentioned that generally such bail pleas are considered by it where the accused has been in jail for a long period without any trial or in such cases where offences are not of serious nature. A Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan expressed strong disapproval regarding this practice where their previous criminal records are being hidden by people applying for bail, which generally comes to light when the respective state government files counter affidavit.
- “A growing trend is being noticed of individuals, seeking from this court the concession of bail or concession of protection from arrest, not disclosing in the special leave petitions their involvement in other criminal cases…The result is that this court, being the apex court of the country, is being taken for a ride. This court has shown leniency in the past but we think it is time that such state of affairs is not allowed to continue further,” the Bench held, pointing out that such non-disclosure or suppression of material facts can become the basis for refusing the bail petition.
- “This court has shown leniency in the past but we think it is time that such state of affairs is not allowed to continue further,” the Bench held.
- Going forward, the Supreme Court has made it compulsory for anyone filing a special leave petition (criminal) to clearly mention their criminal history in the synopsis section of their plea.
- The above mentioned guideline shall be applied to cases filed under Sections 438/439 of the Criminal Procedure Code (bail or anticipatory bail) and Sections 482/483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the decisions of the High Courts or Sessions Courts.
- In order to ensure that all relevant rules have been followed, the Supreme Court directed its registry to circulate the order at a wider range for compliance.
Decision of the Court
The Apex Court ruled that-
- “He shall clearly indicate the same together with the stage that the proceedings, arising out of such case, have reached.”
- In case any false or incomplete information is found at a later stage, such revelation shall be a strong reason to dismiss the special leave petition so filed.
To read similar orders or changes introduced the legal field, you may follow our blogs or follow us on youtube and instagram at Sharks of Law.
In case you wish to talk to a lawyer online or seek free legal counsel from experienced lawyers for matters related to criminal law, civil law or family law, you may contact us Sharks Of Law through following contact details.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993
Adv Vipul Singh Raghuwanshi
Legal expert and contributor at Sharks of Law. Committed to providing clear and accessible legal guidance to everyone.