The Madras High Court recently clarified that any unwelcome behavior that is inappropriate and adversely affects women would undoubtedly qualify as "sexual harassment" under the PoSH Act.
Consult Verified Legal Experts
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Agreements
- Audits
- Trademark & other IP
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Audits
- Trademark & other IP
- Company Registration
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
- Matrimonial Disputes
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Consumer Protection
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Trademark & other IP
Experience
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Property Matter
- Corporate Issues
- Startup Compliances
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
Experience
- Audits
- Trademark & other IP
- Company Registration
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Consumer Protection
- Legal Notice
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Consumer Protection
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Cyber Crime
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Property Matter
- Corporate Issues
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Property Matter
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Property Matter
- Corporate Issues
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Corporate Issues
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Audits
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Matrimonial Disputes
- Legal Notice
- Succession Issue
Experience
- Case Transfer Matters
- Anticipatory Bail
- Money Recovery
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Money Recovery
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
- Insurance Matters
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- Statutory Compliances
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- Agreements
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Agreements
- Employment Matters
- RERA Matters
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Cyber Fraud
- Cyber Crime
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
- Cyber Fraud
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
Experience
- Bail Matter
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Insurance Matters
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Court Marriage
Experience
- RERA Matters
- Case Transfer Matters
- Cyber Crime
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Insurance Matters
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Property Matter
Experience
- Property Matter
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Bail Matter
- Consumer Protection
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
- RERA Matters
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Adoption & Custody
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Cyber Crime
- Rape & POCSO
- Anticipatory Bail
Experience
- Rape & POCSO
- Bail Matter
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Company Registration
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Cyber Fraud
- Cyber Crime
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Employment Matters
- Insurance Matters
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Adoption & Custody
- Matrimonial Disputes
- Legal Notice
Experience
- Court Marriage
- Rape & POCSO
- Matrimonial Disputes
Experience
- Anticipatory Bail
- Audits
- Cheque Bounce
Experience
While deciding a recent case of HCL Technologies Ltd. vs. N.Parsarathy, related to sexual harassment at work place, the Madras High Court observed that any such behaviour which is inappropriate and has an adverse effect on women shall be qualified as “sexual harassment” as provided under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( the PoSH Act). The Court further stressed that decency is measured by how the actions of a person impacts the other gender and not what such persons perceives to be appropriate.
Facts of the Case-
- In 2017, a complaint was filed against N. Parsarathy, a Service Delivery Manager at the HCL Technologies, where he was charged with multiple sexual harassment allegations. The claims included that Parsarathy made unwelcome physical contact, used to ask inappropriate personal questions, thereby creating a hostile work environment for the female employees.
- An Internal Complaints Committee was formed under the PoSH Act, which found Parsarathy guilty of misconduct.
- A series of disciplinary measures were recommended by the ICC, which included removing Parsarathy from supervisory responsibilities, having his role confined to India only as well as denying him pay raises or any benefit for two years. These recommendations were made with an objective to ensure safety and dignity of female employees at the company.
- The decision of the ICC was however, challenged by Parsarathy in the Labour Court, on the basis that there was lack of due process as well as procedural violations on part of ICC. He also argued that the evidence of the CCTV footage was not disclosed and that no cross-examination opportunities were provided during the inquiry procedure which was not fair to him. His plea was accepted by the Labour Court, which set aside the decision of the ICC, in December 2019, based on the principles of natural justice.
- Challenging the decision of the Labour Court, the HCL Technologies moved the High Court, where they asserted that the inquiry conducted by the ICC was fair and that its decision was within its statutory mandate and conducted a fair inquiry.
Decision of the High Court-
- After reviewing the procedure of the ICC, the Madras High Court it to be in compliance with the PoSH Act. the High Court observed that ICC had balanced the rights of the respondent, while ensuring a fair hearing and protecting the rights of the complainant providing a non-intimidating environment during the inquiry.
- The order passed by the Principal Labour Court on the allegations of workplace sexual harassment was quashed by the High Court, where the Labour Court has invalidated the findings of the ICC. The High Court upholding the decision of the ICC emphasised on the the importance of a fair but context-sensitive process of inquiry process in similar cases.
- Criticising the approach of the Labour Court, the High Court observed that it failed to appreciate the nuances of such cases involving workplace harassment. The High Court commented that in these type of cases, the perception of the victim holds is more significant than that of the intent of the accused.
- Explaining the role of ICC, the High Court mentioned that it is similar to a quasi-judicial authority and that the committee's findings can be challenged only in cases with instances of procedural lapses or in case of injustice.
- The bench of Justice R.N. Manjula highlighted that decency is not something which is determined by what an individual perceives to be appropriate but by how their actions impact the other gender.
- Finally allowing the appeal, the High Court quashed the order passed by the Labour Court.
Sharks of Law offers you a team of experienced advocates who have been successfully handling cases related to corporate law, including those related to workplace sexual harassment. Hence, if you wish to talk to a lawyer or seek free legal online counsel, you may contact us.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993
Adv Vipul Singh Raghuwanshi
Legal expert and contributor at Sharks of Law. Committed to providing clear and accessible legal guidance to everyone.